Pages

▼
Sunday, 27 April 2014

Are debatable scientific questions debatable?

›
In a previous post I tried to make clear why debates are such a bad way to improve scientific understanding. In the comments Mark Ryan poin...
11 comments:
Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Climate Change National Forum introduces the nonsense amplifier

›
The Climate Change National Forum now has a section called The Fact Checker. In it they will post the nonsense of pseudo-skeptics and they p...
27 comments:
Saturday, 12 April 2014

Planning for the next Sandy: no relative suffering would be socialist

›
The river Waal at Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The original river is to the left, which was a bottleneck and extra dangerous due to the curve...
7 comments:
Sunday, 30 March 2014

The BBC will continue fake debates on climate science

›
Nigel Lawson , not a scientist, but confuses public about science helped by the BBC. David Rose wrote in The Daily Mail that Mr MacLeod, h...
17 comments:
Saturday, 15 March 2014

Do dissenters like climate change?

›
Ronald McDonald enjoying himself after Hurricane Katrina . The kind of "conversations" I am having in the so-called climate ...
30 comments:
Thursday, 13 March 2014

Why doesn't Big Oil fund alternative climate research?

›
A short post. Asking the question is answering the question. Jo Nova, an Australian climate ostrich, is begging for money to keep blogging...
5 comments:
Sunday, 9 March 2014

The ultimatum game, a key experiment showing intrinsic fairness and altruism among strangers

›
Knowledge will come only if economics can be reoriented to the study of man as he is and the economic system as it actually exists. Ronal...
8 comments:
Wednesday, 5 March 2014

Be careful with the new daily temperature dataset from Berkeley

›
The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project now also provides daily temperature data. On the one hand this is an important improvement, t...
6 comments: